Monday, December 31, 2012

Friday, December 7, 2012

The Climate Conference Puts Their Request For Obama's Second Term In With The Hispanics And The Blacks

I watch "Democracy Now".
Their big drive is "Climate Change".
In the latest UN Climate Conference in Doha the masses of delegates clapped as the US representative took to the stage.  The sentiment was that with President Obama reelected in the United States he will be freed in his second term to release more aggressive environmental policies, in line with the Kyoto Protocols and other agreements that they favor.

As the applause died down and the US rep began to take on questions the initial excitement faded.

As the audience asked if the United States would now do more - the rep made a list of accomplishments by the Obama Administration.  The point was: "You just don't know what we did and this is why you are disappointed in us".

As another member of the audience attempted to get the rep to make a negative point about the conference host - an oil producing country - the US rep defended Qatar as a strong partner and leader.


ANALYSIS

BIGOTRY is both negative & hateful as well as positive & assuming good will.
The most accurate definition of bigotry is that one's OPINION is out of alignment with the real world truth of the subject at hand.

This is NOT a criticism of the Obama Administration.
In fact I applaud them for managing their base.
A politician is typically going to be the gateway through which his base channels their voice, USING them to accomplish the administration's agenda but acknowledging that he ultimately must represent the entire INSTITUTION.   This points to the fact that this base, regardless of how enlightened they believe themselves to be - are a faction of the entire set of opinions and interests.

President Obama is not going to do self-inflicted damage upon the US economy by pressing a hard line on curtailing carbon based fuel.

The point that needs to be made, as we look at a conference who's delegates mostly flew in on carbon burning airplanes - is that THEY need to live down to the standard of living that their theories would enforce.  

Climate change has always been the case upon the Earth.
The question of Man Made Climate Change - is a matter of the balance of ECONOMICS between man's will to accept any consequences that these changes might bring forth versus his will to retain the modern standard of living.  IF AN WHEN there is a tipping point then the bottom line remains - an ECONOMIC decision will be made that our safety from natural disasters are more important.

Deep divisions as UN climate talks near end






Thursday, November 29, 2012

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Philly Daily News Lead Editorialist - I Now Support Susan Rice For Secretary Of State Because The Republicans Attacked Her

YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP!!!!!


The  Secretary Of State engages with the ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

For Philadelphia Daily News senior writer Will Bunch - the fact that THE ENEMY REPUBLICANS had the audacity to call out Dr Susan Rice for attributing the attack in Libya to 'A YouTube Video" rather than Muslim terrorists - was a step too far.

BUT WAIT - Mr Bunch!!

What about the CIA operatives that were working in Libya at the time?   Didn't you like "Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man" when it was highly rated on the liberal reading list?

Did any of your articles inspect if the NATO led coup in Libya was indeed a "Humanitarian Mission"?

No one should be surprised that you were "convinced" that Dr Susan Rice is "The One" for the next Secretary Of State per your logic.   I, for one, will wonder how you will react when you and her have to go beyond your domestic Republican enemies and deal with those people who are not as fair to Obama.


Tuesday, October 30, 2012

"What Chu Talking About Chuck D? We Made Up The Term 'The New World Order' And We Also Decided That Commander In Chief Obama Is Not In It - Like Bush & Cheney Is"

Shaka Griffith: Sorry Chuck, Barack’s Not In The New World Order!


Sorry Chuck D - I have to go with Shaka Griffith on this one.

With "The New World Order" as a manufactured CONGREGATION of forces used to make an ideological/political INDICTMENT - you failed to run your opinion through enough "ears, eyes and brains" for them to consider all of the ramifications of your decision to look at EQUAL OUTCOMES AT THE HANDS OF THE US GOVERNMENT  yet dare to breach the protocol of assuming that a "Progressive Ally" is capable of doing such things via the US Government.

You sure have changed, Chuck D, since you no longer have the daily influence of White Progressive Allies on the radio show, keeping you in line from your "radical thoughts" where you assume that Obama is an "Equal American Imperialist".

Perhaps you need a co-hosting bit with Rachel Maddow to reestablish the limits of your thinking and indictments again?

Monday, October 8, 2012

The Ignorant Black Obama Supporter Doesn't Have The Same Use As Does The Racist Anti- Obama Ignorant Person

Stacey Dash's Family Members Have Gone Too Far With This Republican Mess






(Note:  It is MY OPINION that this "melanated Republican support" is little different than the "3 Chics Politico" as BOTH ARE FOOLING THEMSELVES to believe that an ELECTION is going to change the debt/deficit situation with the United States)


Saturday, September 29, 2012

Obama's Facts On The Deficit Check Out With Me - So I Don't Care What "FactCheck.org" Says

FactCheck: Obama’s deficit dodge


FactCheck.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit "consumer advocate" for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics
President Obama is falsely claiming that his administration’s policies are responsible for “about 10 percent” of the deficits “over the last four years.” The cumulative deficit during that time is nearly $5.2 trillion. Obama signed two bills — the 2009 stimulus and the 2010 tax cut — that alone cost $1.6 trillion during that time, or nearly a third of the cumulative four-year deficit.

How could he have been so wrong? Although he said “the last four years,” the administration tells us that he was referring to a Treasury analysis of a 10-year period from 2002 to 2011 — which includes all eight years of the Bush administration and excludes the 2012 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30 with a $1.17 trillion deficit.

We’re also told that Obama meant 12 percent, not 10 percent, and that 12 percent figure does not represent a percentage of cumulative deficits ($6 trillion) during those 10 years. It’s 12 percent of $11.9 trillion — which is the difference between the Congressional Budget Office’s rosy 10-year budget projection issued in January 2001 ($5.9 trillion in cumulative surpluses from 2002 to 2011) and what actually happened ($6 trillion in deficits).

The Treasury Department analysis claims that Obama’s polices are responsible for 12 percent of “the changes in deficit projections since January 2001,” but even that figure is too low, as we will explain later.



Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Apple Bans "US Drone Strike" Tracking App From "App Store" - What Will Americans Do Now As They Drink Their Expresso From Starbucks?

 While people in Yemen and Pakistan worry about having a missle fired from a US Drone hitting their house......................Americans are pissed that Apple has rejected an iPhone app that was created to track the pot marks that the drones missles have left in these other nations.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Before Obama - Changes Made To Food Safety Inspection Drew Protests - Just Like US Military Action Used To Trigger


The gap between the heightened protests when past Presidents yielded to industry recommendations and the SILENCE that we hear today when the Obama Administration does the same is the measure of corruption that is contained in the ranks of the Progressives and the news media.

Friday, July 13, 2012

The Sound Of "Romney's A Tax Cheat Because Of His Tax Havens" Got Muted Once The Truth About Delaware And Its Long Time Senator Joe Biden Came Out

WHYY Radio Times: Tax Havens - Mitt Romney And The State Of Delaware

Prior to the bankruptcy and reformation of General Motors please note from the paragraph below that it was incorporated in Delaware.


Hughes, a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of GM, also a Delaware corporation. Hughes holds a number of Commission licenses and authorizations directly or through its wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries. Hughes’ wholly-owned subsidiaries include DIRECTV Holdings, LLC, the parent company of DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC and United States Satellite Broadcasting Company, Inc., both Commission DBS licensees. Hughes Network Systems, Inc. is also a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hughes and holds a number of authorizations for transmit/receive earth stations and VSAT networks for use of frequencies in the C and Ku-bands, as well as authorizations for the construction, launch and operation of the Ka-band SPACEWAY Satellite System. Hughes also indirectly holds an approximately 81% economic and voting interest in PanAmSat Corporation, a publicly traded Delaware corporation and the corporate parent of PanAmSat Licensee Corp., a Commission licensee that holds authorizations to operate fixed satellite service systems using the C and Ku-bands, as well as authorizations for numerous earth stations which are licensed to transmit and receive frequencies in the C and Ku-bands.
News Corp. is a corporation formed under the laws of South Australia with securities that are publicly traded on both the New York Stock Exchange and the Australian Stock Exchange. Shareholders holding a greater than 10% interest in News Corp. are K. Rupert Murdoch, a U.S. citizen and chief executive of News Corp., who directly and indirectly controls an approximately 16% equity and 30% voting interest in News Corp., and Liberty Media Corporation (“Liberty”), a Delaware corporation, which holds preferred limited voting ordinary shares representing approximately 17.6% of the shares of News Corp. but with no voting rights except in limited instances. Liberty holds interests in domestic and international video programming, interactive technology services, and communications businesses in the United States, Europe, Latin America, and Asia. Among its holdings are majority ownership interests in Starz Encore Group LLC (100%) and Liberty Satellite and Technology, Inc. (86%), and minority interests in a number of other programming companies. Liberty also holds a controlling interest in Astrolink International LLC, and the largest plurality interest in Wildblue Communications, Inc., both Commission licensees authorized to construct, launch and operate satellites using frequencies in the Ka-band.

It is frustrating to me to listen to people who's intellect and consciousness can't travel far beyond the "Gotcha Politics" that can bring a warm, soothing spirit upon them for the moment.

The latest scheme that has been running involves Mitt Romney's use of tax havens around the world.

I must be honest - as I listened to the above radio broadcast I found myself saying "I WOULD DO THE SAME DAMNED THING if I had the money".     The most logical defense against a group of people with a mindset to confiscate your money is to PROTECT your money from their slimy hands.

In as much as moving out of the city, county or state has not worked, it is reasonable to follow the law and park one's money outside of the country.

What many of these people can't accept, however, is that there has been far, far, far more deprecation in the TAX BASE of the places that they now control after they erected their "confiscatory taxation scheme" than there is in the estimated $9 billion loss in corporate revenues that the tax avoidance schemes have produced.

There is not a single post that I have made endorsing Mitt Romney.  I plan to leave my vote for President blank.
These series of observations are focused upon YOU - and how you are made to act AFTER OBAMA has taken the stage and caused you to compromise yourself.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

The "Disco Obama" Rappers Still Have It All Wrong



Of course many of you believe me to be an "Obama Hater", blood oozing from my eyes when I see him.  Thus when an "Anti-Obama" song comes out FROM THE LEFT I am supposed to plaster it upon my blog site and feel affirmed.

SORRY.

The "Treble Army" still have fundamentally mis-analyzed the situation.

THEY KEEP LOOKING AT OBAMA.
They need to look at how "Obama On Stage" has motivated the Progressive Supremacists to COMPROMISE THEMSELVES.

The Treble Army could have summarized the situation best by noting:
With Dr King and President Johnson - When King stated "Injustice Anywhere Is A Threat To Justice Everywhere" as the pretext for standing against Johnson and the Vietnam War - King implicitly noted that he valued a greater global vision over the issues that he focused on in America.  (Civil Rights).

Today we have the would be "Dr Kings" in "The Struggle" seeking to advance their "Nationalized SOCIAL JUSTICE Agenda" THROUGH President Obama.   Thus when they make the calculation about American Imperialism that continues under Commander In Chief Obama - they understand that NO ONE AMONG THEIR LEFTIST RANKS is going to execute "Self-Criticism" as they all agree to focus on the DOMESTIC "SOCIAL JUSTICE" in the way of advancing progressive supremacy that Obama is bringing to them.

The Treble Army ultimately gets it all wrong because they never talk about the fact that Obama has triggered a grand COMPROMISE among the ranks of the Progressive Left.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

References To "Take It Back" Are No Longer Racist

Washington Secrets: Panicking left scolds Obama deserters



ANALYSIS:

The Failure to do followup on how the Progressive-Leftist Bigots make use of claims of RACISM when their ideological enemies make use of certain phrases, only to turn around and use these same references for their own purposes allows this fraud to continue.

"The Black" is a complicit operative in this scheme.  In the "Malcolm X Political Football Game", The Black-Progressive does not mind allowing himself to be tossed around like the football that we were warned against.

This time he is in it for promises of future profits.



Sensing defeat at the polls and in the December budget wars over extending the Bush tax cuts, liberal leaders have turned to scolding President Obama’s 2008 fans who have deserted him and threaten to undermine his reelection.“Democracy is not an app,” shouted activist and former Obama aide Van Jones, at the opening of a three-day progressivepalooza called “Take Back the American Dream Conference.” Praising the upstart Occupy movement as a model to follow, he decried Obama’s supporters who have given up because change is hard. 
“We’ll quit over a really mean tweet,” he said, adding in a mocking whine: “Did you hear that terrible tweet? And it was retweeted four times.”
He and Robert Borosage, head of the Campaign for America’s Future, which is sponsoring the event, expressed concerns that progressives are demobilizing right when they are needed most because, as Jones said, “people went from hopey to mopey.”
Said Jones to a half-full Washington Hilton convention room, “I’m watching the movement that broke the back of Karl Rove’s stranglehold on Congress, who elected the first African-American president, I’m watching that movement that inspired the world, that shocked the world, that stunned the world, in the moment of maximum peril, sit down.”
Jones said that the movement may have been demoralized when Obama, with a big Senate majority and control of the House in 2009, failed to push a broad agenda and was eventually pushed back by the Tea Party movement.
“It turned out we only had one-third of what we needed to govern,” he said in a call for summertime protests. “You have to have a movement in the streets, and we abandoned the streets. You have to have a media establishment, like they have centered on Fox,” Jones said.
Borosage and Jones also said the movement needs to re-energize not just to reelect Obama but to fight against the Obama-GOP “grand bargain” expected to be cut in the lame duck congressional session in December over the Bush tax cuts, the debt limit and other key economic issues.
But his target for that wasn’t the GOP, it was Obama. “We call on this president to issue a veto threat,” he demanded.

Monday, June 25, 2012

President Carter's Moral Outrage Over US Drone Strikes Does Not Trigger The Same Cascading Outrage As His Base Of Supporters Are Now Debating What "Is" Is

Former president calls on Washington to regain moral leadership in wake of drone strikes and targeted assassinations


After claiming that "racism" was the motivating force behind many of the attacks upon Commander In Chief Obama, Former President Carter must now compel the pacifist  troops that he assisted in pacifying over the past 3 years that "Injustice Anywhere" is still a threat to "Justice Everywhere".

Excerpt from the article:

The former president Jimmy Carter has declared that US drone strikes and targeted assassinations abroad have seen the country violating human rights in a way that "abets our enemies and alienates our friends".
In a stinging attack on US foreign policy in the New York Times, Carter says America is "abandoning its role as a champion of human rights" and calls on Washington to "reverse course and regain moral leadership".
Revelations that top US officials are targeting people, including their own citizens, abroad are "only the most recent disturbing proof" of how far such violations have extended, he says in a furious critique of the administrations of George Bush and Barack Obama.
At a time when popular revolutions are sweeping the globe, the US should be strengthening, not weakening "basic rules of law and principles of justice", Carter says in the paper on Monday. His criticisms, just months before Obama hopes to regain the White House in November's presidential election, lambast the use of drones and detention.
Attacks on human rights after the terrorist atrocities of 9/11, have been "sanctioned and escalated by bipartisan executive and legislative actions, without dissent from the general public", says the Nobel peace prizewinner. "As a result, our country can no longer speak with moral authority on these critical issues."
Carter adds: "While the country has made mistakes in the past, the widespread abuse of human rights over the last decade has been a dramatic change from the past."
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948 with US leadership, "has been invoked by human rights activists and the international community to replace most of the world's dictatorships with democracies and to promote the rule of law in domestic and global affairs. It is disturbing that, instead of strengthening these principles, our government's counter-terrorism policies are now clearly violating at least 10 of the declaration's 30 articles, including the prohibition against 'cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment'."

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

The Coming Drone War

Drone warfare foretells an ever-expanding and illegal war

John Fabian Witt
This blog is ultimately not about President Obama.


It is about the presence of Obama and how the will of those with a vested interest in protecting Obama as they protect their ideology and party are made to compromise themselves in the process of doing so.



It is my opinion that (aside from Democracy Now - an independently produced show) "The Eliott Spitzer Show" on "Current TV" is the most thoughtful "left wing news analysis" show on the air.

Despite the fact that I am "right of center" I am less of a blind opponent of the progressive than I am against the use of arm twisted mob-ism to force an illogical argument through.   

The truth is that indeed the "left wing muckraking media" has been talking about the threat that unchecked use of drone aircraft could pose to the long term interests of the United States.  The problem is that it is not being picked up by their activist allies who would turn it into an INDICTMENT against the Commander In Chief.   So while they have the necessary intellectual debates on how a foreign nation will one day develop the technical competency to launch drone attacks into the United States - this point has not achieved "Occupation Status".

Keep an eye out from a book from John Fabian Witt which will ponder all of the questions and legal ramifications on the use of drones. 

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Misogonystic Bigot Bill Maher Would Have A Tough Time Doing To Dr Moyo What He Did To His Previous "Chocolate Treats"




In this video segment where economist Dr Moyo takes the pseudo intellectual rantings of comedian Bll Maher and translates them into a more disciplined economic pronouncement - we see that Maher is more interested in defending Obama from "unfair attacks" than he is in making accurate statements himself.

White other Black females that Maher has dated warned not to be fooled about his "open mindedness" per his will to cross the color divide.  He treated them like intellectual punching bags, browbeating them when they rendered an opinion that he did not agree with.

There is no doubt what so ever that Dr Moyo is far beyond his mental capabilities.

Friday, June 8, 2012

"No Mormon In The White House" Blog

Romney & The Mormons Believe They Become GODS. (D&C 132)

"Brethren 225,000 of you are here tonight. I suppose 225,000 of you may become GODS. There seems to be plenty of space out there in the universe." Mormon Prophet Spencer W Kimball, General Conference, Oct 1975. D&C 132: 20 Then shall they be gods,






It appears that the presence of Mitt Romney the "Mormon who threatens to enter the White House" will yield an interesting set of events into our political discourse.


The Right-Wing religious intolerance that had been attacked by the left as it was directed against Muslim Americans will get a consistency test as some portion of the right-wing stands against Republican Mitt Romney ascending into the White House.


My agenda is NOT to make an indictment against the left in a "Why don't you protect Romney" sort of way.  The ignorance of these right-wing operatives stands alone.    


I make the distinction between my personal religious beliefs and that which is acceptable in the government.   


In my past power to hire people on my job - I saw that the corporate standards had to trump my personal opinions when selecting a qualified candidate.  I believe the same is true with respect to government.


The proper disposition then, for both left and right, is to stand against the "religious litmus test" that anyone seeks to place upon any elected official.


It is one thing that look at how a persons' agenda will damage the nation - regardless of if these views come from his religion or not, versus the practice of making a generalized indictment of one's religion and using this profile to reject an individual member's ability to be judged based on his own merits. 

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Obama Is The Moral Authority On Drone Strikes



The American Anti-War Left continues to see the strategic mistake in their present complicity with Commander In Chief Obama on the issue of drone strikes on sovereign nations without challenge.

The reporter is exactly correct that these lead edge weapons will one day be in the hand of a larger set of nations.   The United States is placing itself in a position where it won't be able to credibly comment on these actions from a moral high ground position.

It shows that MIGHT MAKES RIGHT is more universally accepted than those who deny this tenant wish to believe.

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

High School Obama Supporter Branded A "Racist" For His Caricature Of Obama's "Racist" Critics


Hopefully the young White male progressive who has the unfortunate stain of living in the South and having to assume the racist profile of so many of his White male brothers has learned his lesson.

When you are attacking your racist White cousins for the benefit of Obama you must clearly define your position and not leave it up to the readers to "get the sarcasm".


From The Article:

Trevor May graduated last month with honors -- and a potentially toxic reputation -- after writing a column in Sprayberry High School's student newspaper satirizing critics of President Barack Obama.
Google his name and you'll find plenty of people -- adults, mostly -- branding the 18-year-old Marietta resident as a racist..
"There were [white supremacist] blogs taking my side," May said. . "That was the most depressing thing out of all this."
May's column "Top 20 Reasons Why Obama Should Not Get Re-Elected," published April 25, mixed some of the more sensational allegations leveled against the president with his own intentionally absurd observations, such as, "His dog is ugly" and "He doesn't have a mistress."
There were also intentional contradictions  -- "He's a Nazi. He's a Zionist." -- that May assumed illustrated his point. 
But it seems many people didn't get past the first item: "He's black."
"This was something I tried to write to defame racists yet it was being thrown in my face like I was the bigot," said May, whose 17th reason was, "He's a white supremacist." "I really thought people would find this funny. I was upset people didn't get it."
Sprayberry parent Danisha Crummie, who leaked the story to local media outlets after saying she did not receive a satisfactory response from officials at the Cobb Countyschool, was among those who objected to the column, which appeared in The Stinger's annual satirical insert, The Zinger.

Commander In Chief Obama, The More Efficient Imperialist, Shows That The Trick To Avoid Anti-War Protests And ACLU Lawsuits Over Torture Is To Launch Small Scale, Constant Violations Of Due Process Of "Alleged Terrorist" Rights

I say this in all sincerity:  President Obama is the most efficient imperialist "Commander In Chief" that this nation has had in recent history.

IF we measure a Commander In Chief's effectiveness by the balanced index of carrying out the "machine's" (America's/ The West's) agenda versus riling up active protests against what the administration is doing - there are no other Commander In Chief that matches President Obama.


Obama has found a way to make the right-wing war hawks happy that the US military is striking "terrorist" targets that are considered threats to American interests.
More interestingly, however, Obama has been able to check the left-wing, anti-war forces over his actions.   Having adopted a "Reverse Dr King" strategy - they are not intent to allow their domestic progressive agenda squandered by a stand against a progressive president who is violating what they had been protesting against just a few short years ago.



From The Article
Rockets fired from a U.S. drone killed 15 people in northwest Pakistan on Monday, intelligence officials said, an attack likely to add to tensions between Washington and Islamabad amid a standoff over NATO supply routes to Afghanistan.
The strike, the third in three days, targeted a militant hideout in the Hasukhel village of the North Waziristan tribal region, officials said.
A senior Pakistani official based in Mir Ali told NBC News the drone had fired four missiles on a "big" compound in the village.
It brought the death toll from drone attacks in Pakistan in the past three days to 27. Pilotless U.S. drones hit targets in the South Waziristan tribal region on Saturday and Sunday.
Local villagers in Hasukhel old NBC News that six U.S. aircraft were seen flying over the area during the attack on the house.
The United States and Pakistan are deadlocked in difficult negotiations for the re-opening of overland supply routes to NATO forces in Afghanistan. No breakthrough is in sight.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

In 1968 When There Was A Politically Driven "Birther Movement" But The Operatives Where Not Considered Racists



In 1968 it was presidential candidate George Romney that was the target of a "birther movement" 

"We Didn't Get Any 'Race To The Top' Money But OBAMA Is Still Responsible For Educational Reform In Our State

NY Times - Thomas Friedman - "Obama Should Seize The High Ground"

 DURING a recent discussion in Seattle with a group of educators, one of them surprised me when she pointed out that even though their state did not win President Obama’s education “Race to the Top,” that program was critical in spurring education reform in Washington State. As I listened to her analysis, the thought occurred to me: I wonder how Barack Obama would do if he ran for president as himself. ... How he would do if he ran for re-election on all the things he’s accomplished but rarely speaks about.

 How do you compete with that?


Whereas under normal circumstances "Show Me The Money" is used to appraise one's "love" for a given interest - in the case of this "group of educators in Washington state" money was of no consequence.

I assure you that if you tried to qualify and quantify the material results in Washington state that these educators are pointing to they would fall below the threshold of credibility in regards to the source motivating these reforms and the outcomes proportional to the scale of the problem.

“Obamacare is socialized medicine,” says the Republican Party. No, no — excuse me — socialized medicine is what we have now! People without insurance can go to an emergency ward or throw themselves on the mercy of a doctor, and the cost of all this uncompensated care is shared by all those who have insurance, raising your rates and mine. That is socialized medicine and that is what Obamacare ends. Yet Obama — the champion of private insurance for all — has allowed himself to be painted as a health care socialist.

I suspect that Mr Friedman and many others will be singing a different tune as this nation's fiscal base is confined by a growing debt and more money is spent on debt service than on health care.

Think about this: Obama didn’t just save the auto industry from bankruptcy. Two years later, he also got all the top U.S. automakers to agree to increase mileage for their vehicle fleets to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, from 27.5 m.p.g. today. As Popular Mechanics put it, this “is the largest mandatory fuel economy increase in history.” It will drive innovation, save money and make America less dependent on petro-dictators. Did you know Obama did this?
Mr Friedman's talking point about "saving the auto industry" is merely a shift of a burden from GM/Chrysler's balance sheet onto the federal government's debt register.   Notice he said nothing about Ford Motor Co - who did not file for bankruptcy because they began working with their unions and suppliers years earlier to get their finances in order.

This article sounds like a marketing piece rather than a serious attempt at analysis of the troubled condition that this nation finds itself in.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

American Idol Economic Analysis



My personal commitment to investing in research and analysis is often threatened by my observations that propaganda proves more powerful if your goal is mass influence and acceptance.

The latest news of President Obama being a "Budget Hawk" as proven by the slowing growth in federal spending is yet another point of evidence of such propaganda.

If we fail to note that the majority of the people who will be championing this news about Obama are themselves Keynesian in their economic theories and thus such a shrinkage is an affront to what they actually believe - the first round of filters on their logic will be by passed.

Next - we must understand that the United States has seen a tremendous economic slowdown (indeed a global slowdown) since 2008.  This has hit the revenue intake of the US government.   When people attack Obama for having run up a $5 trillion debt - they are in error to pretend that he created a boatload of new spending.

Instead the increasing federal deficit is from a nation that is more committed to retain some semblance of  a particular economic standard of living, even when it is beyond its economic means to do so.(also known as "fronting") 
This short term ability to retain this order comes at the cost of its long term viability.   Each bit of federal debt should be seen as yet another draw upon a cigarette, which the American Cancer Society has translated in to minutes of life taken from the smoker.

But that's not all.

The greatest irony of the JingOists is that they are unable to see the spending increases that OBAMA PROPOSED, that they ATTACKED their common enemies for opposing, and yet having failed to accomplish these "Debt Stimulating Stimulus Spending Proposals" - being intent to wave alms at Obama over something - they now point to his moderation in spending.


(I am not going to bother doing the research of the immediate past to find YOUR words.  You will remember them on your own)


The greater drive of the JingOist is to retain the favor of Obama with their base RATHER THAN have them attach their loyalties to the economic standing of the nation as a whole and its long term viability.

YOU ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE ACCESS TO SOCIAL JUSTICE IN THE LONG RUN
Yearly Federal Budget Deficit

Saturday, May 12, 2012

How Obama Is Transactionally Successful In The Eyes Of The Progressive-Fundamentalists Who's Ideological Blindness Prevents Them From Noting The Big Picture Failure In Stewardship

When your goal from the start is to tell the good news of "Your Guy" - it stands to reason that you also will be forced to avoid talking about the larger context.

Daily-KOS "Obama keeps good on his promises - Pays Native Americans the billions owed to them"


There is no question that when the content providers at The DailyKOS sees President Obama keeping good on his promises to give the money due to the Native Americans and attacking corporations - they get a tingle up their leg.

To them this is proof that we have "just leadership" at the helm of the ship (now).

The reason why Obama can be so "good" is because the DailyKOS is not going to note that this $4.5 billion in "justice money" comes in the context of a $1,200 billion in deficit spending that has been ran up each year for the past 3 years.

The rhetoric of the "Drunken Sailor spending spree" is now tabled because THIS TIME the DailyKOS likes the "drunk" and likes what he is spending on.

Upon bankruptcy does anyone recall a person who told the bankruptcy court that she did not spend her money on a closet full of shoes, instead she went broke paying her utility bills on a credit card?


Thursday, May 10, 2012

How Obama Uses A Dual Chum Feeding Strategy To String His Left-Wing Base Along





HOW OBAMA PLAYS HIS BASE:
In the Same 2 Weeks:

The Good
The Damnable Offense To The Progressive Sentiments
Announce That The "Pantie Bomber II" Plot Has Been Foiled  Announce That The Administration Has Approved Increased Drone Bombings In Yemen
Tell how a double agent that you had in Al Queda assisted you in targeting and KILLING a terror SUSPECT Restart Bombing In The Sovereign Nation Of Pakistan
Announce that you support the radical redefinition of Marriage, selling it as the FIRST SITTING PRESIDENT to do so (as part of your PROGRESSIVE marketing strategy) The Policy Advisors Warn That Social Security And Medicare Will Be Insolvent At A Date That Is Sooner Than Was Predicated A Few Years Ago - Pointing To Trouble Ahead




COUNT ON YOUR PROGRESSIVE BASE to choose to cheer about the 3 good items and dutifully remain silent on the items that are a threat to their progressive sensibilities - that they used to protest against because they were proof that the last Commander in Chief is a killer who had no respect for due process.

The people who's consciousness is that of a perpetual fight against their ENEMY IDEOLOGY rather than a retention of their ideological standards - are going to always choose praise and focus on their enemy rather than how THEIR FRIEND is showing everyone who is watching that their base only believes in POWER. 

Monday, May 7, 2012

VP Cheney Was Right - Deficits Don't Matter - After Obama



The Anti-Republican / Obama Sycophant Blog - EZKoo.com offers up a truncated chart on "Job Creation" which focuses on the contrast between the last 2 years of Bush versus the last 3.5 years under Obama.

It never occurred to the biased propagandist to scale the chart back several years earlier to capture more data.  I'm sorry.  YES IT DID occur to him.  This would cause his argument to crumble as he moved beyond the financial crisis that rocked the nation between 2007 and 2009.


I have no expectation that Ezkool is going to avoid "lies of omission".  His job is to frame the issue in which Obama looks good, regardless of the data and to have the opposition to Obama look bad.  In this case he (and Nancy Pelosi) understands that by limiting the data set from April 2008 through to today they can achieve the characterization that they desire.

If we expand the US job creation numbers from 2003 over to Aprl 2011 (I just happened to find this chart from a Google Image search) - the scheme to frame the argument is exposed.

I only desire HONOR in one's debate.  Some people understand that "honor" is a constraint to their agenda.


The first thing to do to disarm such a propagandist that PURPORTS to be representing the interests of the Black community and "The Least Of These" is to work to get  them off of the "Bush/Obama' battle and instead to force them to make qualitative statements about THE CONDITION OF THE COMMUNITY TODAY.   NOT with reference to OBAMA but instead in reference to their own INTERESTS.

As such I ask Ezkool - "Are YOU satisfied with a 13% Black unemployment rate - after more than 50 years of Black Community Development Consciousness" INVESTMENTS into the president machine that dominates your interests locally, state-level and now federal?

People like Ezkool are itching for a fight.
In doing so he prefers to "Keep His Enemy On Trial" so that he doesn't have to "INDICT his friends".

The only way to dislodge such a consciousness is to transform his thinking from "The Malcolm X Political Football Game" over to an "INVESTMENT ADVISER" in which "his peoples" retirement resources and "intergenerational wealth" are now under his control - the future outcomes and ORGANIC COMPETENCIES that appear through the institutions under his control - define the aggregate standard of living for his people - 100 years from now.

I am working on a means of transitioning the prevailing Black Political Consciousness from "STRUGGLE" against the past over to "Management Of Present Institutions" - using a data driven approach by which an increase in dispassionate assessments are made.
I already have my data loaded into Microsoft Access to do some number crunching.

Stay tuned.

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Prediction: News From Obama's College Era Girl Friend Will Get More Coverage Than The National Debt Or The Insolvency Of Social Security







If I checked and noticed that none of this news sites had information on:


THE LOGICAL SELF-JOUSTING MATCH OF THE DAILY KOS.
(You have to understand that I understand why many of you all think the way you do as you read news sources like The Daily KOS. )

The author lays out the facts - Medicare is funded through a payroll deduction for its funding.
He then makes the case that the choices for funding Medicare is akin to military spending.  
Military operations are a CONSTITUTIONALLY mandated function of the federal government - indeed the amount is a choice.

Yet - despite the fact that in a short amount of time this nation is going to spend more on federal debt interest service than on the Military - the author believes that this should be pared while controlling the growth of entitlement programs is some type of violation of "Social Justice".

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

How Commander In Chief Got The Left To Support The Death Penalty


NY Times Piece By Peter L. Bergen Focuses On "Obama The Efficient American Imperialist" Confuses EFFICIENCY For JUSTIFICATION

NY Times - Warrior In Chief By Peter L Bergen

If you read the article like Mr Bergen of New America Foundation wants you to read it and you'll focus on Commander In Chief Obama's EFFICIENCY at using the US Military war machine.   Activeness and absent protests and lawsuits appear to be Mr Bergen's evidence of Commander In Chief Obama's success.

The main flaw in the argument is that it is based upon certain circular references - the absent of JUSTIFICATION for these actions - per the claims of "Due Process", "Permission From The United Nations" and "Anti-Human Rights/Torture Morality" - Mr Bergen's analysis seems reasonable.



If those on the left were listening, they didn’t seem to care. The left, which had loudly condemned George W. Bush for waterboarding and due process violations at Guantánamo, was relatively quiet when the Obama administration, acting as judge and executioner, ordered more than 250 drone strikes in Pakistan since 2009, during which at least 1,400 lives were lost.
Mr. Obama’s readiness to use force — and his military record — have won him little support from the right. Despite countervailing evidence, most conservatives view the president as some kind of peacenik. From both the right and left, there has been a continuing, dramatic cognitive disconnect between Mr. Obama’s record and the public perception of his leadership: despite his demonstrated willingness to use force, neither side regards him as the warrior president he is.


In the passage above Mr Bergen makes the case that Commander In Chief Obama successfully dispensed of the legal conundrum that Commander In Chief Bush got entangled in with Guantanamo and Abu Gharab - by BLOWING UP the people who would otherwise provide standing to "The International Red Cross" and the ACLU - as they filed a lawsuit for "Social Justice".  


Strange it is that Bergen does not care to switch from an inspection of OBAMA and (do as this blog does) go into the gallery and look at the psychological motivations of the people who are watching as THE MACHINE is now free to do its thing.


(I didn't forget about the right wing).   What relevance is it that  that the right wing believes Obama to be a "peacnik" (who is also a Muslim)?  Just as a friend of mine told me that Progressives taunt Conservatives as "racists" with the hopes that they will do MORE progressive actions than they would normally do in an effort prove that they are not "racists" - it is likely the case that such taunts against Obama are to a crowd that is quite pleased with his war-hawkishness.


Still this misses the point.    Few people are inclined to ask if Obama - per the seat of POWER that he now resides in - had the compunction to allow the machine to do its present deeds and that the public face that was appealing to the Progressives - is now effective in CHECKMATING them.


It is my opinion that since the progressive left has so much vested in Obama and live vicariously through him - that to take a stand against him - THE STAND THAT THEY HAD TAKEN AGAINST THE MACHINE when it was doing the same thing which ran counter to their soul prior to Obama - would be counter to their real interests - the instillation and perpetuation of PROGRESSIVE FUNDAMENTALISM into power.


(Executive summary - Why is anyone surprised at any of this?  MASKS have been taken off)


Why is it that the invasion of Libya under the auspices of enforcing a "No Fly Zone" a VICTORY yet not a sign that the United Nations is merely a front that must be defended against?


How is it that several raids in Somalia that killed 4 times the number of people than it rescued is a sign of EFFICIENCY rather than PSYCHOSIS (among those who are cheering yet believe themselves to be just?)


The summary point that is missed by Mr Bergen is - just as Commander In Chief Obama was given the "Nobel Peace Prize" at the front end of his presidency - for his POLITICAL MARKETING CAMPAIGN that seemed to unite the world - IF these same people who now see a track record that calls into question the merits of his Peace Prize and went into action to demand a revocation of the prize - IT IS THEY WHO WOULD BE ATTACKED by the "JingOists" for their SLIGHT AGAINST OBAMA.


For you see - there are far more people who wish to have OBAMA'S STATURE STAND ERECT - all the while their own INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY - that which they wanted us to believe about their moral character prior to it being tested - now stands tarnished - the fake gold leaf now peeling off to expose the plastic underneath.



Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Which Of These Two "Obama Aviation" Stories Have Gotten More Press In The Pass Week Within The "Obama Fist Bump Press"?


A Rainbow Is Pictured Just Outside Of Air Force One, Lifting Obama Up In The Air As The Captain Cut The Jet Engines And Flew On Unicorn Oil


US Drones Fired In To Pakistan And Yemen Leave Smoke Trail Rather Than Rainbows
Just Prior To Killing Terror Suspects That Have Been Identified By The American Military And CIA Per The Rules Laid Out By The Obama Admnistration


Monday, April 30, 2012

Obama's "Buffett Tax" Will Raise Only $47 Billion Over 10 Years While The US Government Will Spend Over $47,000 Billion In The Same Period



The greatest frustration that I have IS NOT with my ideological disagreement with any group of people or politician.

My issue is with the outright FRAUDULENCE of those who claim to be credible in their political prognostications.

When it comes to President Obama - again I say - it is best to look past his own words and actions and LOOK INTO THE CROWD at the JingOists.

They are so revered up for any fight that their "Commander In Chief" puts them up to that they are loathed to AFFIRM THE VERACITY of the fight that Obama placed before them because of their IDEOLOGICAL entrenchment.


  • The Buffett Tax plays upon people;s "Tax The Rich" sentiment and thus they can't see past the fact that it only raises at most $5 billion per year.   This in the context of a federal government that is $1,200 billion in the hole EACH AND EVERY YEAR.    (I get angry because I wish I was making this up and not seeing what I am seeing)
  • The Student Loan Interest battle is a fight to avoid a doubling of interest................from 3% to 6% - a sum that was made to look like a $1000 PER YEAR in crease.  In truth it is $1000 over the life of the loan and thus about $10 a month.

My observation to look into the crowd is an attempt to note the amount of integrity that people have yielded in defense of Obama as they seek to battle on his behalf.

Rest assure that a GOP-bigot has the same proclivity to compromise himself.