Thursday, February 19, 2009

Racism Chasers Come To Life In Chimpanzee Editorial Cartoon



This post is a message for WHITE FOLKS.

What you are seeing in this uproar over the editorial cartoon is called a "brush back".  

You see the operatives who fein "offense" are making an early and preemptive strike against you.   Where as on most EVERY OTHER CASE the editorial cartoon creator would be allowed creative license to cobble together key issues in the news into one cartoon edition - the Racism Chasers are sending out a message about what is off limits.

As a Black man the cartoon is NOT racist.  It is clear that the cartoonist is critical of the recent Stimulus Package.  It goes without saying that everyone is talking about the "Killer Chimpanzee" as well.   With all of the discombobulated spending within the Stimulus Bill it goes without saying that someone saying "A monkey could have written this" is in line with tradition.

BUT WAIT A MINUTE - things have CHANGED.

Let's take a look at the people who are feining outrage.
They are 

  • Black
  • Democrat biased
  • Progressives
  • favor the Stimulus Package
In their brush back they are able to achieve a measure of suppression of criticism of this bill by INJECTING RACE into the dialogue.

YES I say that THEY injected race into the issue.  There is NOTHING about this cartoon that purports to call Barack Obama a monkey.  I am 100% sure that Roland Martin and Al Sharpton know this.  They are simply seeking to be preemtive.

Please note that they never said anything about the "Bush Or Chimp" web site.

At the end of the day, against as a Black man, for a Black person to have a stimulus/response where when someone talks about monkies that Black person feels offended is a problem within THEMSELVES.  You should only react to what you feel is true.





Simply amazing folks - From Roland Martin:

If you haven't seen the editorial in question, it shouldn't take you long to figure out that the subtle message was clear: comparing President Obama to a chimpanzee.


Delonas, the cartoonist, said to CNN, "It's absolutely friggin ridiculous. Do you really think I'm saying Obama should be shot? I didn't see that in the cartoon. The chimpanzee was a major story in the Post. Every paper in New York, except The New York Times, covered the chimpanzee story. It's just ridiculous. It's about the economic stimulus bill. If you're going to make that about anybody, it would be [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi, which it's not." Watch Roland Martin, other CNN panelists debate cartoon »

To the editors who approved the cartoon, as well as the cartoonist, the piece was clearly all fun and laughs. But anyone with half a brain, especially someone knowing the history of African-Americans being called monkeys and gorillas, would have said, "We need to rethink this."

First, mixing the two stories is ridiculous. Yes, the chimpanzee incident and the passage of the stimulus bill have a lot of folks talking, but to put them in the same element just doesn't make sense.



Second, the cartoonist didn't hang a sign around the neck of the chimp, so he left it up to the reader to determine exactly who the cops were referring to.

We all know that the stimulus bill was the first priority of the new president, so when reading the caption, it was easy to infer that the cartoonist was implying the president of the United States.

You know, the black guy.

And that's where the problem comes in.

What could be seen as silly humor if President George W. Bush were in the White House has to be seen through the lens of America's racist past, as noted by the leaders of the New York Association of Black Journalists, who also are demanding an apology from the Post.

"How do you think the Jewish community would feel about the use of rats in any depiction of them? How do you think the Italian community would feel about being generalized with mobsters?" the organization said in a statement.

"Monkey slurs against Africans and African-Americans go back to the days of early colonialism, when Anglo Saxon, Spanish and Portuguese conquerors used these types of drawings and descriptions to dehumanize black people so that their mistreatment and enslavement would not be viewed as wrong or sinful. The practice also took on more sinister roles later in history including during the slave trade here in the U.S. and in Hitler's Nazi Germany."

Ignorant leaders of the New York Post and others may think everything is fair game, and certainly criticizing the president of the United States is just fine. Yet while everyone seems to be caught up in the delusion of a post-racial America, we cannot forget the reality of the racial America, where African-Americans were treated and portrayed as inferior and less than others.

And just as some members of the media brotherhood were taken to task for their obvious sexism during the Democratic primaries because of comments about then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, we had to be sensitive to the historical treatment of women.

Oh yes, the Post will have its defenders, accusing African-Americans and others of being hypersensitive. The Post has already shown its hand by trying to make this all about Sharpton, since they know he's the black bogeyman to white America. But they should understand that my e-mail box and Facebook page are filled with comments from folks of different backgrounds stunned by the callousness of the Post.

I guess it's fitting the cartoon ran today, because the best statement to sum up the issue can be taken from a black history month speech given today by our first black attorney general, Eric Holder.

"Even as we fight a war against terrorism, deal with the reality of electing an African-American as our president for the first time and deal with the other significant issues of the day, the need to confront our racial past -- and our racial present, and to understand the history of African people in this country -- endures," he said.



"One cannot truly understand America without understanding the historical experience of black people in this nation. Simply put, to get to the heart of this country, one must examine its racial soul."


White Folks - Translation of the last paragraph:
BLACK PEOPLE get to decide the sensibilities of our own history. And you can rest assure that our state of OFFENSE is going to be dangled around in reaction to obtaining the maximum opportunity out of the situation.